must there be a definition for everything ? should we strictly define such an abstract fragrance ? ain't it safer not to name Love...just feel it, enjoy it. trying to find a solution to this " what is love ? " equation is like having a bite from a red, ripe apple... it will oxidate and lose its initial taste.
maybe because of my technical background, i prefer to have a quantifiable objective definition for everything.. this makes things much easier to communicate..
however, maintaining the subjective way of interpreting things makes life more colorful :-)
but love is neither science or art. I see love as a smiley, pink boogy man (a positive boogy man of course, not cupid, he's annoying) who takes over your head and heart and makes you go where no one has gone before.
7 comments:
i think it all depends on how one defines love! do you have a definition for love?
must there be a definition for everything ? should we strictly define such an abstract fragrance ? ain't it safer not to name Love...just feel it, enjoy it. trying to find a solution to this " what is love ? " equation is like having a bite from a red, ripe apple... it will oxidate and lose its initial taste.
i don't have a definition for love and i don't want having one. The definition for love is the feeling itself.
maybe because of my technical background, i prefer to have a quantifiable objective definition for everything.. this makes things much easier to communicate..
however, maintaining the subjective way of interpreting things makes life more colorful :-)
but love is neither science or art. I see love as a smiley, pink boogy man (a positive boogy man of course, not cupid, he's annoying) who takes over your head and heart and makes you go where no one has gone before.
i still don't like to give "love" (which is eventually a feeling) a size bigger than what it really might be.. love is a feeling, right?
more than a feeling, i'd 'say', 'smth' innefable ...
Post a Comment